« Photos and Report from the Protests in Washington DC | Main | Book Review: "The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy" »

September 28, 2005

What Misperceptions?

How often do we hear that when two nations, or peoples, are at odds with one another that it is a problem of perceptions? Too often, I'd say. And while this is mainly an issue with the left, and their insistance on endless negotiations and student exchanges, others have picked up on this too.

Take this tidbit from today's Washington Times:

Karen Hughes, the Bush administration's top public diplomacy official, came to Saudi Arabia in a bid to improve the U.S. image, but her hosts turned the tables yesterday and asked her to help create better perceptions of Saudi Arabia in the United States. ... She sought an opportunity to explain unpopular U.S. policies that cause anger and resentment in the region.

Instead, she received an earful of complaints that the American people have wrong ideas about the Saudis and little is being done to correct those misperceptions.

And what, in particular, upsets the Saudis?

Earlier yesterday, students and professors from Dar al-Hekma College decried the way Saudi women are portrayed in the United States.

During a town-hall meeting with Mrs. Hughes at the all-women's college, one student noted "a very negative picture of Muslim women that is created by the American media and supported by the U.S. government."

How oh how might that picture have been developed? Maybe by the fact that women are at best second-class citizens in Muslim-ruled countries? Grrrr.

But wait, there's more. Sent to my by a friend in the UK who follows the Saudis closely:

From The Guardian:

If Downing Street bows to today's reported Saudi demands for concessions in the hope of a Eurofighter sale worth up to £40bn, it will face dissent from the Foreign Office, the Serious Fraud Office, and British Airways. There will also be anger from such expatriate victims of Saudi behaviour as Ron Jones, who is trying to sue the regime for falsely imprisoning and torturing him.

Whitehall sources point to the two Powell brothers, who they claim are enthusiasts for the deal. Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair's chief of staff, is said to be pro-Saudi. His brother Charles, now Lord Powell, also has access to Downing Street. He was Margaret Thatcher's foreign affairs adviser, and is now on BAE's payroll as a consultant, according to the current register of Lords' interests. BAE stands to make massive sums from a deal to sell the Eurofighter Typhoon to Riyadh.

I've written about Ron Jones before. He was among several Britons and others imprisoned by the Saudis in 2001 for allegedly planting bombs in their country. He and the others were working there as many westerners were when they were suddenly arrested and held incommunicado for several months. They were brutally tortured and forced to make false confessions on Saudi TV.

Unfortunately, they did not receive much if any help from their governments, who seemed more interested in maintaining good relationships with the KSA (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) than the welfare of their own citizens.

More on "our good friends" in the KSA, this time from the BBC (story again courtesy of my friend in the UK):

The Saudi Arabian authorities are refusing to reveal what action was taken against a diplomat suspected of sexually assaulting a child in London.

The man was arrested at the end of July last year but was released after claiming diplomatic immunity.

The Saudis say he will not be able to return to the UK, but have offered no information as to his fate.

The Foreign Office has refused to hand over papers on the case, despite a BBC freedom of information request.
...
The alleged assault against the 11-year-old girl generated anger in the newspapers when the Saudis refused a request by the British to waive the man's diplomatic immunity.

This left police unable to even question the man about the allegations.
...
The Saudis have steadfastly refused to comment on the case.

It was understood that the man would be dealt with by the Saudi justice system on his return. But the outcome of the Saudis' investigations remains unknown.

Still want more? Think that the Saudis are fighing against terrorism? If so, they're being mightly selective about it. Check out this latest from MEMRI:

Saudi Government Official on Iqra TV: All Muslims Must Support Jihad – Send Money to the Saudi Committee for Support of the Al-Quds Intifada, Account No. 98

An August 29, 2005 program on Saudi Iqra TV was devoted to supporting Jihad in Palestine. The program host began by telling all Saudis that they must donate and explained how to do so.

A caption then appeared on the screen: "Saudi Committee for Support of the Al-Quds Intifada, Account No. 98, a joint account at all Saudi banks." A moderator stated that "Jihad is the pinnacle of Islam" and explained that the funds would go directly to those waging Jihad, where it would "help them carry out this mission."

The program included the secretary-general of the Saudi government's Muslim World League Koran Memorization Commission, Sheikh Abdallah Basfar, who explained why it was an "obligation" for all Muslims to support Jihad. He also promised that "all of the funds sent via the known charities and organizations" would reach "your Muslim brothers." TO VIEW THIS CLIP VISIT: http://memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=843.

All all these are stories that have appeared in the press just recently. I didn't have to do any digging.

There are no "misperceptions", folks. We understand perfectly well what the government of the KSA represents.

Posted by Tom at September 28, 2005 8:19 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/490

Comments

testing as Kings1 with previewing at what misperceptions

Posted by: kings 1 at October 17, 2005 9:57 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)