« Toward the Brink | Main | Chinese Threat Update »
March 7, 2006
Leftist Whacko Items You May Have Missed
Two topics in this post
1) Leftist groups that fund the terrorist insurgents in Iraq
2) Leftist groups that have given their approval to killing American and coalition troops in Iraq
Funding Terrorism
Guess what leftist organizations are funding the terrorists in Iraq?
Besides Code Pink, that is.
European leftists, that's who. I missed this when it first came out last June, but this US News and World Report story documents how leftists in Europe
Turns out that far-left groups in western Europe are carrying on a campaign dubbed Ten Euros for the Resistance, offering aid and comfort to the car bombers, kidnappers, and snipers trying to destabilize the fledgling Iraq government. In the words of one Italian website, Iraq Libero (Free Iraq), the funds are meant for those fighting the occupanti imperialisti. The groups are an odd collection, made up largely of Marxists and Maoists, sprinkled with an array of Arab emigres and aging, old-school fascists, according to Lorenzo Vidino, an analyst on European terrorism based at The Investigative Project in Washington, D.C. "It's the old anticapitalist, anti-U.S., anti-Israel crowd," says Vidino, who has been to their gatherings, where he saw activists from Austria, Denmark, Germany, and Italy. "The glue that binds them together is anti-Americanism." The groups are working on an October conference to further support "the Iraqi Resistance." A key goal is to expand backing for the insurgents from the fringe left to the broader antiwar and antiglobalization movements.
Don't think that these people are just buying "humanitarian supplies" either
Some funds may be buying more deadly stuff; one leader boasted to Vidino that the campaign will send "everything it takes" for the resistance to win, including weaponry. Neither Iraq Libero nor Campo Antiimperialista responded to questions from U.S. News about where their funds end up.
The article makes clear that these people probably haven't raised a lot of money, but of course that isn't the point. One penny it too much. As is often said of Christmas presents, "it's the thought that counts." And this time the thought is murderous.
Code Pink's Funding Operation
At the top of this post I mentioned a group called Code Pink. They are an American-based radical pro-Castro group who's full name is "Code Pink Women for Peace"
In December of 2004 they gave some $600,000 in cash and supplies to the terrorists in Fallujah. This was just before the US attack that freed the city from the insurgents. David Horowitz has the full story on this group on his DiscoverTheNetwork.org database website here.
If you don't believe Horowitz go to Code Pink's website, where they admit to doing it. It was also reported on TurkishPress.com
License to Kill
A "World Tribunal on Iraq" was held in Istanbul on June 24, 25, and 26 of 2005, Democracy Now! sponsored the A full list of endorsers can be found on the World Tribunal website. Here are some of the ones you've probably heard of
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee - NY Chapter
CODEPINK: Women for Peace
GreenPeace
International A.N.S.W.E.R
International Action Center
National Lawyers Guild - NYC chapter
Not in Our Name Project
The Greens/Green Party USA
Among their findings, taken directly from the World Tribunal website:
1. The invasion and occupation of Iraq was and is illegal. The reasons given by the US and UK governments for the invasion and occupation of Iraq in March 2003 have proven to be false. Much evidence supports the conclusion that a major motive for the war was to control and dominate the Middle East and its vast reserves of oil as a part of the US drive for global hegemony.2. Blatant falsehoods about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and a link between Al Qaeda terrorism and the Saddam Hussein régime were manufactured in order to create public support for a �preemptive� assault upon a sovereign independent nation.
All of this is standard leftist patter. This next one is a bit more interesting
8. The imposition of the UN sanctions in 1990 caused untold suffering and thousands of deaths. The situation has worsened after the occupation. At least 100,000 civilians have been killed; 60,000 are being held in US custody in inhumane conditions, without charges; thousands have disappeared; and torture has become routine
So...they're against both the war and the sanctions the preceded it? Would they have prefered that Saddam be given free reign to rebuild his WMD after the Gulf War of 1991? Apparently so, for they give no indication anywhere that they see Saddam's Iraq as a threat.
But it's this next one that you ought to read very carefully
11. There is widespread opposition to the occupation. Political, social, and civil resistance through peaceful means is subjected to repression by the occupying forces. It is the occupation and its brutality that has provoked a strong armed resistance and certain acts of desperation. By the principles embodied in the UN Charter and in international law, the popular national resistance to the occupation is legitimate and justified. It deserves the support of people everywhere who care for justice and freedom.
"...the popular national resistance to the occupation is legitimate and justified."
Get it? It's ok to kill American and coalition soldiers. There is simply no other way to read that part.
I think it's ok to question the patriotism of these people.
Posted by Tom at March 7, 2006 8:33 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/602
Comments
Code Pink tried to distribute medical supplies to refugees. It may that some terrorists were among the ranks, but IIRC they were still holed up in Fallujah. So it's reasonable to assume that the overwhelming majority of refugees weren't terrorists.
Re WTI: support for the insurgents is, indeed, insane. That said, I didn't see Democracy Now among the endorsers.
Re: sanctions: it's reasonable to hold that the sanctions could've been more carefully targeted at military infrastructure & supplies. As implemented, they were collective punishment, and it's not unreasonable to oppose collective punishment.
Posted by: jpe at March 8, 2006 8:44 AM
jpe is correct that Democracy Now! was not a sponsor of the tribunal. I have made the necessary correction to the above post.
However, jpe is a Useful Idiot if he thinks that Code Pink did not knowingly give aid to the terrorists in Fallujah. They knew what they were doing.
The leftists opposing the sanctions were not doing so because they had any concern for the Iraqi people. They opposed the sanctions because they hate America and support dictators who oppose us.
Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at March 8, 2006 8:04 PM
All I know is what I read. I'm not privy to CIA reports being beamed through my fillings. So, unless there's evidence to the contrary (note:anything coming straight from the zionist/illuminati conspiracy will be disregarded), I don't see why I shouldn't take Code Pink at its word - the aid went to refugees.
Posted by: jpe at March 9, 2006 8:26 PM
(that isn't to say the WTI statement isn't crazy and evil - it clearly is. But we're dealing with a specific allegation of aiding insurgents through alleged aid to refugees, and I just don't see any evidence of that. Produce it, and my mind will change. That's how it works in the reality-based community.)
Posted by: jpe at March 9, 2006 8:28 PM
Oh for heavens sake.
Media Benjamin and her group went to Fallujah when it was controlled by the terrororists(or "insurgents" as you prefer). At the time the terrorist insurgents controlled everything that went on in the city. Therefore the people Benjamin dealt with were by definition tied to or even the terrorist insurgents themselves. Further, the refugees of Fallujah were quite anti-American in their sympathies. Benjamin may be a commie, but she isn't stupid. She knew the situation in Fallujah and thus who was receiving the supplies. Even if the people she actually handed the stuff to were "average citizens", of course the terrorist leadership ended up taking it, as surely she knew would happen. Further, it is well known that these refugees were very anti-American in their sympathies. So it is kind of like distributing aid to a city in Germany during WWII that was known for being a hotbed of Nazism.
If you're looking for a press release or a photo with Benjamin with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi or some other known terrorist sorry it isn't there to my knowledge. This is a situation where you have to use logic and put two and two together.
Then you have to consider who the founders or Code Pink are and what they've done. The World Tribunal finding #11 ought to clue you in as to what these people actually think. Before that was the 1980s when they aided Central American Communists. For example, Code Pink leader Sandy Brim once arranged to get a doctor to operate on Communist leader Nidia Diaz, whose men had recently killed four US Marines. Look it up.
I could go on and on but you get the point. Connect the dots.
But in the end you can believe what you like. Take care and have a nice day.
Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at March 9, 2006 9:29 PM
Media Benjamin and her group went to Fallujah when it was controlled by the terrororists
I know it'd be nice to invent facts, but let's assume that you can't your words don't create states of affairs. According to the "facts," as we call them, the group set up shop outside of Fallujah.
Even if the people she actually handed the stuff to were "average citizens", of course the terrorist leadership ended up taking it, as surely she knew would happen.
*chuckle*
I'm sure that's obvious from your vantage point in your mom's basement somewhere in Middle America.
Posted by: Anonymous at March 11, 2006 12:37 AM



