« Book Review - "Future Jihad" - Part 2: Who are the Jihadists? | Main | Soldiers Angels in Kansas City »

March 12, 2007

Book Review - "Future Jihad" - Part 3: Methods of the Jihad

One of the problems we face in fighting this war is that I do not think that most people understand who we are fighting. Much of this is the fault of the Administration, which insisted on calling it the "War on Terror"

This name implies that the only people who really threaten us are those who engage directly in terrorist acts. As such, when you mention "War on Terror" most people, I think, believe that we are fighting al Qaeda and al Qaeda only.

In Part I of my review of Walid Phares Future Jihad, I introduced his book and laid out the jihadist's world view. In Part II I mapped out the three branches of the jihad as identified by Phares; two Sunni Salafist, Wahabi and Muslim Brotherhood, and the third Shiite, the Khumeinists.

In this installment I'll discuss some of the methods the jihadists use against us as identified by Phares. Readers will note that violence is not part of all or even most of the jihad.

Following is a brief overview of the methods used by each of the three branches of the jihad. In future installments I'll go through each of these in more detail.

The Wahabists: Top Down Jihad

As discussed in Part I, Salafi Wahabist Islam is the state religion of Saudi Arabia. The goal of the Wahabists is to spread their version of Islam throughout the world, and eventually unify it under the caliphate. The way they do this is by sending "pilgrims" into targeted societies/countries and infiltrate it's institutions. This process is funded by oil revenues. The function of the Saudi state is to reassure the targeted people that all is well and that there is nothing to be worried about. In effect, to pull the wool over our eyes.

At the end of World War II the Wahabists made two historic choices; first, they decided that they would adhere to Western concepts of international law, and second, they allied themselves with the West against the communists.

Their method of spreading their version of Islam is characterized by Phares as a "top down" approach:

The Wahabi state logic was perhaps the most perfect one: Float with the world, release the teachings without violence, let the teachings plant the seeds, wait for their growth irrigate them with money, and make sure to mollify any abrup reaction from the other side. ...

(At the formation of the Saudi state) a historic deal was cut between the emirs on the one hand and the radical clerics on the other. The monarchy would manage the finances and political power, including diplomacy, while the scholars would be in charge of the souls, especially the young ones. The other component of the equation, the Salafi clerics, roamed the world preaching Wahabism with state funding and encouragement.

The Muslim Brotherhood: Bottom Up Jihad

Unlike the state-sponsored Wahabists, the Brotherhood is independant of any state. It works with rulers who are sympathetic to it, but operates outside of them. Theirs is a "grassroots" strategy. While the Wahabists "float with the world", the Brotherhood floats with the target society, which thus far has always been a Middle Eastern one.

The Brotherhood is part of the same Sunni Salafist tradition as the Wahabists. To some extent the Brotherhood competes with the Saudi Wahabists for influence within the Muslim world. Sometimes they cooperate, it all depends on the politics of the moment.

Basically, the Brotherhood seeks to change a society and government by trying to put its members or symthathizers in positions of influence. These positions may be in the media, industry, military, or, if it exists in the target country, a parliament. It is willing to start small, encouraging members to join at the "entry level" and work their way up. Rather than fighting the regime directly, it seeks to undermine it from the bottom up.

After infiltrating from the bottom up, they work their way back down again. As Phares explains, "the Brotherhood would be intereted in spreading through the elites, converting them patiently into the Salafi doctrime, and only then enlisting them into the organization." They never engaged the regime directly until they reached full strength. Their methods were "amazingly fluid and adaptable to circumstances. Their ideal shortcut wa to infiltrate the ranks of the military and proceed with a coup d'etat against the government. Their next choice was to "advise" the ruler and influence him instead."

In addition, the Brotherhood has created Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad to pursue the fight against Israel. Hamas is a terrorist group, but also participates in the political process. This is important to note, for it again shows the sophistication of the Brotherhood in pursuit of it's goals. We must understand that these are not a bunch of ignorants who sit around playing with AK-47s and C4 explosive.

The Khumeinists: The Shiite Superpower

It is important not to think of this group as Iranians for the simple reason is that is not how they see themselves. Yes, nationalism plays a role. But the mullah's highest allegiance is to Allah, not to their nation. While this is theoretically true of all religious people, it would be a mistake to see a similarity between the Khumeinists and Western Christians or Jews. The goal of the Khumeinists is not Iranian power but the creation of a Shiite Imamate.

As discussed in Part 1, for thirteen centuries the Shiites were shut out of the jihad. Considered a footnote, the West barely took note of them. All of the ancient calphates were Sunni. When they gained control of Iran in 1979 they shook the Musim world to it's foundations by announcing that they would not only participate in, but would lead, the jihad. This not only placed them in competition with the Salafists, but spurred the latter on to more extremism as well.

While the Salafists seek to infiltrate targeted countries/societies, the Khumeinists seek to build a superstate that will dominate the region. Their goals are limited by the demographics of where Shiites live; Iran and a few other countries in the region, notably Iraq.

From what some Shiite jihadists have said, once the Khumeinist superpower is in place, a more general jihad can ensue which will result in the Fatah(conquest of infidels).

Next up: How the Wahabists undermine the West

In the next installment we'll get into more detail on how the Wahabists go about the business of infiltrating Western societies.

Posted by Tom at March 12, 2007 9:41 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/856

Comments

Great summary. I would also consider the depth of the Shiite/Sunni divide, which is very critical in Iraq and I want to point out that jihad is not a uniting, universal tenant in Islam, just another convenient excuse to kill, used by many Islamic sects to further their own goals. But first some ancient Islamic history:

Abu Bakr (companion of Muhammad) was the first Caliph after Muhammad died, and angered those who thought a relative of the prophet should be the Caliph after their prophet died. These people conspired, and in 656, the 3rd Caliph (Uthman) was overthrown by those who though the caliphate should pass on to the descendent's of Muhammad. Ali (cousin of Muhammed) was their choice and became the 4th Caliph until he was ‘martyred’ in Kufa (Iraq), and the Caliphate shifted to Syria for the next hundred or so years. The Shiite (literally the Shait-u-Ali, or the ‘supporters of Ali’) view Ali as the first Imam, and view him as a sort of demi-god or the real founder of their Shiite sect, including the Twelvers (the apocalyptic types waiting for the 12th Imam).

The Sunni (those who followed the Sunnah, or practice of Muhammad) don’t think the Caliph needed to be related to Muhhamad in order to carry on their religion and aren’t as obsessed with Ali, or the twelfth imam. This ancient split is manifest today, when over 100 Shiite pilgrims were killed last week at various festivals celebrating something about Ali (something the Sunni could give a rat’s ass about).

Contrary to many delusions, Islam is not a fundamentally peaceful religion. Muhammad was persecuted in Mecca, fled to Medina, gathered an army of about 2,000 and came back and kicked the crap out of those who tossed him out of Mecca the first time and those who fought him along the way. Throats were cut, blood was spilled, and the saga began. Read some history about Muhammad, he lived in tough times and his little band of followers fought often and were very bloodied. The mantle of the prophet (relics of the Muhammad worn to signify the caliph leadership) was often lifted off of a corpse with multiple stab wounds and slit throat to be bestowed (sometimes shortly) on the next Caliph.

Posted by: jason at March 13, 2007 1:19 AM

"Contrary to many delusions, Islam is not a fundamentally peaceful religion."

Good heavens, jason, I thought you said you were a Democrat? If so, we need more like you. I'm getting the impression you're a "Scoop" Jackson Democrat. Is that right?

It also sounds like you've been reading Robert Spencer. I picked up his book "The Truth about Mohammed" at CPAC and will do a review on it sometime in the next month or so. At that point we can discuss further the nature of Islam.

Thank you also for the history of the Sunni-Shiite split. You are right, these people The West largely got over its religious wars a few hundred years ago, what with the Treaty of Westphalia and all that. Sure you've got Northern Ireland, but the combatants aren't really religious in the way they are in the ME.

Islam never underwent any such change. No Martil Luther, no Treaty of Westphalia, none of it. Indeed, as I mentioned in Part 1, Ibn Taymiya and others took Islam from the enlightment to the Dark Ages, from which it has never emerged.

One of Phares' themes is that the jihadists see what we consider ancient history to be something that might have happened last Thursday. To them there is no "modern age" that separates us from the ancient struggles. They see it as their mission to reestablish the calphate or imamate and resume the fatah. And they're trying to do it.

Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at March 13, 2007 7:31 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)