« When What "Everyone Knows" Is Wrong | Main | Islamberg - Is it a Threat? »
May 15, 2007
Islamist-Left Alliance Meets in Cairo
"Where else can you sit down in a single evening and listen to senior people from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, people from the revolutionary left and the antiwar movement from around the globe?"— British Trotskyite John Rees at the Cairo Anti-War Conference, April 2007
Steven Stalinsky, writing in the New York Sun last week, reported on Rees and the "anti-war" conference he attended.
These meetings, Stalinsky says, are nothing new
Over the past year, multiple international conferences have featured leaders of the anti-global left and Islamist groups working together. Go to any anti-war or anti-globalization demonstration in the West and chances are you will see the flags of Hezbollah and Hamas waved by people wearing Che Guevara T-shirts. And at some of these meetings, members of such radical Islamist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and Hezbollah have enjoyed starring roles.The roster of Islamist-left alliances quietly grows every day: Massachusetts Institute of Technology linguistics professor Noam Chomsky praises Hamas and denounces America on Hezbollah's Al-Manar television. London Mayor Ken Livingstone invites a leading Islamist, Sheikh Yosef Al-Qaradawi, who is known for supporting suicide attacks, to visit his city. Iranian President Ahmadinejad calls for a world without America even as he plays host to a Tehran peace conference attended by American Mennonites, Quakers, Episcopalians, Methodists, and leaders of the National Council of Churches.
If you are a Christian, you might want to follow the link above to the NCC website to find out if your church is a member. I assure you that mine is not, because not a penny of my money is going to that organization.
What went on at the conference?
The key forum at this year's annual Cairo Anti-War Conference was titled "Bridge-building Between the Left and Islam," and focused on practical ways to increase cooperation. The aim of the conference sessions were described in one piece of literature as tackling "the challenges and prospects facing the international anti-war and pro-intifada movements" and planning "strategy and tactics for bridging the gap and uniting Islamist and leftist ranks in the face of U.S. imperialism and Zionism."
The cooperation is between leftist and Islamist groups.
Photographs and a more complete report can be found on the Arabist.net website.
David Horowitz reported on this alliance over two years ago in his book Unholy Alliance. Melanie Phillips documented the same nexus in the UK in her eye-opening book Londonistan.
On it's surface, one would think that the left would abhore radical Islam. Even Islam in it's moderate varieties opposes many of the causes that the left holds dear, such as gay marriage. Islam as practiced in many areas of the world is theocratic, misogynistic, and excuses violence.
The short answer as to why the left would ally itself with radical Islam is that they hate the West so much that anything seems preferable to it. America is unjust, therefore any wars she fights are unjust. There is little difference between Democrats and Republicans to the hard left.
The heyday of the Old Left was in the 1930s and 40s, and while the New Left (their terms, btw) made a brief splash in the 1960s and 70s, they were both on a downhill slide until 9-11. The War on Terror has increased their numbers, but despite their ability to influence policy remains limited.
The objective of this hard left is to destroy the West. They want to replace it with some variant of communism. Their problem is that in order to achieve the second goal they need to get past the first one, which remains elusive. They want to use the Islamists/jihadists to destroy the West.
The left believes that they can control the Islamists, just as the Islamists believe that they can manipulate the them. Unfortunately for the left, their numbers remain steady while the number of Muslims in the West and indeed around the world is increasing almost exponentially. It is the left that is being used, and if the jihadists ever do seize control of a Western country, it is the leftists that they'll kill first.
Posted by Tom at May 15, 2007 8:04 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/900
Comments
Yes, yes, certain factions of the left are kooky, just like certain factions of the right are also kooky, the vocal GOD HATES FAGS church group are kooks, David Duke (who was an honored guest at Iran's Holocaust denial conference)is a kook, Pat Roberston is a kook, Mormon sects who arraign marriages between old polygamist men and teenage girls kooks, etc.
The real story is the violence in Pakistan, an islamist country that (unlike Iraq) already has the bomb and a long history of directly supporting and helping in the formation of the Talban and Al Queda. If the opposition in Pakistan erupts in a real civil war, there is a chance that radical elements sheltered in Waziristan could be uncomfortably close to obtaining functional nuclear weapons. This scares me. Morons in Che shirts waving Hamas flags don't, just like morons such as David Duke and Pat Roberston don't deserve a second thought.
Posted by: jason at May 16, 2007 1:09 PM
So I'm not allowed to comment when far-left groups meet with jihadists? Or if I do I also have to make some obligatory statement about how there are kooks on the right too?
Besides, it's not as if I went off on a rant or something.
It is news when far-left groups meet with jihadists, just as it is far-right idiots like David Duke meet with them. As for Duke, I did actually write about his presence at that anti-holocaust conference. In the end, it's not front page news, but it is news, and I think I'm allowed to write about it every now and then.
You are being way too sensitive, and besides, I enjoy writing about kooks.
Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at May 16, 2007 4:17 PM



