« "Understanding Current Operations in Iraq" | Main | Quote of the Century »
June 27, 2007
"Understanding General Petraeus's Strategy"
Continuing in my series of trying to understand what's going on with regard to current operations in Iraq, today I bring you Frederick Kagan's testimony earlier today before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs (h/t NRO)
Frederick Kagan is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Instutute. Along with retired General Jack Keane is co-author of the draft of the current plan of operations in Iraq, commonly called the "surge". Keane's last position before retirement in 2003 was Vice Chief of Staff of the Army. You can find their plan on the AEI website.
Here are some of the more important parts of Kagan's testimony:
American military forces in Iraq are now entering the second phase of their kinetic operations even as political efforts continue on a separate but linked track. Ambassador Ryan Crocker and General David Petraeus are in the midst of a multi-faceted program that will not proceed in a linear way and will not generate clear and consistent metrics in all of its phases. ...It is now beyond question that the Bush Administration pursued a flawed approach to the war in Iraq from 2003 to 2007. That approach relied on keeping the American troop presence in Iraq as small as possible, pushing unprepared Iraqi Security Forces into the lead too rapidly, and using political progress as the principal means of bringing the violence under control. In other words, it is an approach similar to the one proposed by the ISG and by some who are now pushing for political benchmarks and the rapid drawdown of American forces as the keys to success in the war. It is no more likely to work now than it was then. Political progress is something that follows the establishment of security, not something that causes it.
So much for the notion that the report put out by Jim Baker and Lee Hamilton's Iraq Study Group is a good plan.
The first phase began on January 10th with the announcement of the new strategy and the beginning of the movement of the 5 additional Army brigades and Marine elements into the theater. That deployment process was only completed at the beginning of this month--in fact, critical enablers for those combat forces are still arriving in theater. As the new units entered Iraq, the U.S. military commanders began pushing those that were already in the theater forward from their operating bases into Joint Security Stations and Combat Outposts in key neighborhoods in Baghdad and elsewhere. The purpose of these movements was not to clear-and-hold--the units present in theater were not sufficient in numbers to conduct such operations. The purpose was instead to establish positions within those key areas and to develop both intelligence about the enemy and trust relationships with the local communities that would make possible decisive clear-and-hold operations subsequently. During this phase of the operation, additional Iraqi Security Forces deployed to Baghdad in accord with a plan developed jointly by the U.S. and Iraqi military commands. All of the requested units appeared in the first Iraqi Army rotation, and the Iraqi military has just completed its second rotation of units into Baghdad--again, all designated units arrived, and their fill levels were generally higher than in the first rotation.Generals Petraeus and Odierno did not allocate the majority of the new combat power they received to Baghdad. Only 2 of the additional Army brigades went into the city. The other 3 Army brigades and the equivalent of a Marine regiment were deployed into the areas around Baghdad that our generals call the "Baghdad belts," including Baqubah in Diyala province. The purpose of this deployment was not to clear-and-hold those areas, but to make possible the second phase of the operation that began on June 15. The purpose of this operation--Phantom Thunder--is to disrupt terrorist and militia networks and bases outside of Baghdad that have been feeding the violence within the city. Most of the car bomb and suicide bomb networks that have been supporting the al Qaeda surge since January are based in these belt areas, and American commanders have rightly recognized that they cannot establish stable security in the capital without disrupting these networks and their bases.
But even this operation--the largest coordinated combat operation the U.S. has undertaken since the invasion in 2003--is not the decisive phase of the current strategy. It is an operation designed to set the preconditions for a successful clear-and-hold operation that will probably begin in late July or early August within Baghdad itself. That is the operation that is designed to bring security to Iraq's capital in a lasting way that will create the space for political progress that we all desire.
There's a lot more, of course, but this is the part I wanted to post because it goes to understanding what is going on. Many people, myself included mistakenly thought that when the "surge" plan was announced earlier this year, new operations would commence immediately. While to some extent that was true, the serious stuff did not start until Operation Phantom Thunder started on June 16.
Posted by Tom at June 27, 2007 8:53 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/930
Comments
"by some who are now pushing for political benchmarks and the rapid drawdown of American forces as the keys to success in the war"
No one ever claimed these were "keys to success". They are keys to withdrawl.
The keys to "Success" (depending on how you want to define it) were lost long ago in the immature rush to get to daddy's car.
Posted by: grumpy old fart at July 5, 2007 10:49 AM



