« Weekend Iraq Update | Main | The Real Iraqi Army »

July 26, 2007

The Iranian Hostages

You may not know it, but the government of Iran is effectively holding 4 American hostages and 1 Canadian.

It was a Mark Steyn column from Monday that prompted me to write this piece. I'd heard of the situation before I read his piece, but haven't saved any articles. He doesn't list all of the hostages, so I've had to piece this together by finding them one by one.

Here they are:

Haleh Esfandiari is the director of the Middle East program at the Smithsonian’s Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Her friends have started a "free Haleh" website, I believe that she holds dual American and Iranian citizenships.

Kian Tajbakhsh (sometimes "Yahya Kian Tajbaksh") is an urban planning consultant with the New York-based George Soros Open Society Institute,. There is also, appropriately, a "free Kian" website. According to the website, he is "an internationally-respected scholar, social scientist and urban planner". He holds both American and Iranian citizenship. Exploring the website, under "Kian's Writing" we find a piece called "An Iranian in New York: America’s Split Personality". In it he takes a leftie view of Sept 11, for example describing Bill Moyers as "that rare American intellectual" before quoting him.

Ramin Jahanbagloo (or "Jahanbeglou") is an Iranian-Canadian who was, at least for a time, adjunct professor of political science at the University of Toronto. According to Wikipedia he was arrested in April of 2006 while traveling from India to Iran, held at least for a time at Evin prison, and released from on August 30. He is not allowed to leave Iran.

Ali Shakeri, advisor to a California-based group called Center for Citizen Peacebuilding, is currently being held in Evin prison. He left Iran in the early 1970s, but went back some months ago to visit his ill mother. On May 8 he was arrested and is still being held.

Parnaz Azima is another Iranian-American held in Iran. She left the country in 1979 after being branded a "counter-revolutionary". She returned two years ago after receiving an official invitiation from the government. For awhile they treated her "like a VIP", but when Ahmadinejad came to power she has been threatened by the authorities and subjected to interrogations. She 's not imprisoned, but the authorities won't let her leave.

I don't know much about the Woodrow Wilson Center, but I'm sure they're not a conservative group. None of the above people can be considered a real threat to the Iranian government...unless it's just democracy that they're afraid of.

Three of the above, Ramin Jahanbegloo, Kian Tajbaksh, Haleh Esfandiari, gave their "confessions" on Iranian TV, which were aired by Iranian Channel 1 on July 18 and 19, 2007.

The invaluable MEMRI has the transcript of their "confessions". What's interesting is that they don't "confess" to stealing military secrets or anything important at all.

Haleh Esfandiari says that her role was to provide information to the American government on Iranians who came to speak at the Woodrow Wilson Center. The speakers were from Iran, but are not further identified. As to her involvement with the Woodrow Wilson Center and other similar organizations,

"There is a connection between the government, the government officials, and the heads of these research centers. It is like a revolving door." ...

"I have been in Iran for nearly five months now. I have had an opportunity to think about the issues I have discussed with you. I have come to the conclusion that these people - myself included - have become links in a chain created by foundations, research institutes, and universities, that have, in the name of democracy, in the name of the empowerment of women, and in the name of dialogue, created networks in Iran, which should eventually bring about fundamental changes in the Iranian regime. In fact, they should shake the system."

Kian Tajbaksh says that his job with the Soros Foundation was to act as a laison between his organization and Iran.

"The fact that the American government allowed the Soros Foundation to have this project on Iran indicates that despite the differences in policy that Mr. Soros and his foundation have with Mr. Bush's Republican Party, they are in agreement with regard to their plans concerning Iran." ...

"The long-term goal of the Soros Foundation is to achieve an open society [in Iran]. The way to achieve this is to create a rift between the rulers and the people. Through this rift, those parts of civil society which were formed and strengthened according to the concept of open society will exert pressure on the rulers to change their conduct."

Ramin Jahanbaglou "admits" to having contacts with Haleh Esfandiari, who's Woodrow Wilson Center "receives most of its funding from the U.S. Congress, and therefore, it had connections there." He concludes that

"Now, when I look back on all my activities during the years I spent in America until I reached Iran, I realize that my activities served the interests of Iran's enemies, and not the interests of the Iranian people. I regret this very much, and I think I should make amends for this."

These are "confessions"? What a joke.

All they really did was say that they're working with the US government to promote democracy in Iran. Some crime.

As upset as televised "confessions" are to Westerners, Iranian leaders are said to be quite pleased with the spectacle:

Government spokesman Gholamhossein Elham told reporters on July 22 that the televised confessions did not constitute "legal" evidence but rather revealed "the nature of a cultural assault" on Iran by the United States. At the same time, he said the security-related "criminal" charges against Esfandiari and Tajbakhsh are separate issues to be dealt with by the judiciary and investigators. He suggested that "the issue of their being spies and charges against them concern judges and the judiciary," adding that "they have committed a criminal offense, an act against national security with the methods they used."

The head of the parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, Alaeddin Borujerdi, argued on July 21 that the program provided "outstanding" evidence of alleged U.S. "interference in Iran's internal affairs," the "Javan" daily reported. He said the detainees' statements showed how the United States is allocating what he described as "enormous sums" to "obstruct" Iran.

Borujerdi also claimed that the hostages "have made these confessions voluntarily and in a fully free atmosphere."

The government is so confident that it recently announced that it had arrested several associates of Esfandiari and Tajbakhsh.

What is Going On?

As I've said numerous times, I certainly hope that the CIA is aiding Iranian democracy groups. Our best hope for avoiding a Middle East holocaust is to get rid of the current government in Iran and replace it with one that is genuinely representative of the will of the people. Unlike with Iraq, however, regime change in Iran is not official U.S. government policy.

Looking at the biographies of the people being held, though, I find it very hard to believe that they're the sort who would work for the CIA, even on a non-violent project like supporting democracy movements.

More likely, the Iranian authorities know that the CIA and other Western intelligence agencies are hard at work trying to subert their government, and as such need to arrest someone, if for no other reason than to feel like they're doing something. Likely the counter-intelligence fellows are under intense pressure to come up with arrests, and since they can't find any genuine spies these will have to do.

The other probable motive is to send a warning to Western governments any anyone considering working for their intelligence agencies: spy on us and this is what will happen to you - if you're lucky.

Finally, it just seems to be in the nature of totalitarian regimes to put on show trials. I grew up reading about Andrei Vyshinsky and the Moscow Show Trials of the 1930s. Things never seem to change
.
What Are We Doing?

Not much, from what I can tell. "Quiet diplomacy" seems to be the order of the day. This exchange between Press Secretary Tony Snow and an unnamed reporter

Q Will there be talk about the four Iranian American scholars and activists that are being held?

MR. SNOW: No. The conversations are restricted to security matters within Iraq proper. That is the channel that has been opened up. This is not a way of broadening diplomatic contacts between the nations.

Q And about the five Iranians being held inside Iraq?

MR. SNOW: Well, again, what we're talking about are those who have been trying to destabilize Iraq. That is going to be a topic of conversation.

Yes well we wouldn't want to upset the talks by bringing up uncomfortable topics like hostages. We all know the Iranians are so interested in a stable Iraq.

Sigh.

Posted by Tom at July 26, 2007 9:10 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/950

Comments

Don't forget the poor 14 squirrel hostages. Bet sharia law is pretty harsh on rodents serving the Zionist cause. Just where are all the animal rights activists when you need 'em?

Seriously though, Tom, whenever I see anyone at the National Review ask where's the outrage over this, I scratch my head. Iranians take hostages. That's what they do. To paraphrase Georgie Anne Geyer in Buying the Night Flight, you can see that taking hostages is the Iranians' idea of a release of national tensions: their Oktoberfest, only they do it in November, without alcohol.

People who accidentally fall into a snake pit deserve sympathy and help. People who deliberately dive headfirst into snake pits? Gee, I dunno...

(Sorry if this is a bit harsh and unsympathetic. Heck, I live in Taiwan, and all that stuff about foolish people diving into snakepits might someday be said about myself as well!)

By the way, add to the list Robert Levinson, a former FBI agent who visited Iran recently and has "disappeared". Just what on earth was HE thinking?

Posted by: The Foreigner at July 28, 2007 4:40 AM

Fair enough point, Foreigner. Now that I think about it, this situation reminds me of the hostages seized by Hezbollah and other groups Lebanon during the 1980s. I always wanted to ask them, "after the first few hostages, why didn't you leave?"

Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at July 28, 2007 11:03 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)