« Obama the Pro-Abortion Candidate | Main | "Freedom of Speech in Jihad Analysis: Debunking the Myth of Offensive Words" »
October 19, 2008
Joe Biden, Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle, and When a Gaffe is not a Gaffe
Oct 20: Updated at bottom with today's Biden gaffe
And to think that they crucified Dan Quayle because he spelled "potato" wrong.
Unless they do the same to Joe Biden, the media and late night talk-show hosts who made so much fun Dan Quayle need to send him a letter of apology.
Anyone who follows politics knows that Senator Biden is a walking gaffe machine. Consider this small collection of his wit and wisdom:
If you're not sure, Roosevelt was not president when the stock market crashed and TV hadn't been invented in 1929.
And then we have his debate with Alaska Governor Sarah Palin:
" When we kicked -- along with France, we kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and Barack said, "Move NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don't know -- if you don't, Hezbollah will control it."Now what's happened? Hezbollah is a legitimate part of the government in the country immediately to the north of Israel."
Huh?
"Pakistan already has nuclear weapons. Pakistan already has deployed nuclear weapons. Pakistan's weapons can already hit Israel and the Mediterranean."
Pakistani missiles barely have the range to get halfway to Israel, much less hit anything in the Mediterranean.
We could go on and on listing Biden's gaffes, see here and here for material. Joe Biden says stupid things every single week. The man is an absolute walking gaffe machine. But listing them is not my purpose, and would take too long.
The True Story of the Potato
Did you know that the reporters who were in the room with Quayle when he misspelled "potato" didn't know how it was spelled either? It's true. Not only that, but the school had prepared flash cards with the words that were used in the spelling exercise, and the one for the word in question had it spelled as "potatoe"
Bet you didn't know that, either.
In fact, when Quayle noticed the discrepancy between the flash card and the way the student spelled it, he showed the card to the other adults standing with him, and they nodded in agreement that the student had spelled it wrong.
That little fact wasn't reported by the media either.
The true story of what happened can be found in many places, but perhaps the most comprehensive is by Quayle himself in his 1994 memoir Standing Firm. He devotes an entire chapter to the incident.
I'm not going to do a book review here, but suffice it to say that if you think that Quayle uses the book as an opportunity to settle scores, lash out at the media, or engage in bitter "I didn't deserve it," you'll be disappointed. Quayle is the opposite of the stereotypical politician; humble, candid, and amazingly hard on himself.
When Is a Gaffe not a Gaffe?
So why is it that Joe Biden does not suffer the same fate as Dan Quayle? Why is it that Sarah Palin is seemingly held to a higher standard than other Biden? These are not easy questions to answer, but let me take a shot at it.
One is simply how you look and come across. Joe Biden looks and sounds like a senator or professor. He also looks his age. Dan Quayle has a boyish look that chronological age will never wear away. Sarah Palin sounds like a midwestern "everywoman," and makes no attempt to act or talk Washingtonese.
Another is how you handle the aftermath. Quayle admits that he screwed up the press briefing that immediately followed the incident. At this point neither Quayle or anyone in his entourage knew anything was amis (recall that no one in the room challenged the "e" and many thought it correct). When a reporter slyly asked "so how do you spell "potato" again?" he should have realized his earlier mistake and made a joke about it. Unfortunately, he was caught off guard and unsure what the reporter was talking about. It was this "deer in the headlights" part of the incident that made a small mistake into a career defining event more than the incident itself.
All this, remember, according to Quayle himself. I told you he was hard on himself in the book.
The media is on the lookout for anything Sarah Palin might say that is slightly wrong. Rest assured that if she said that "jobs" was a three letter word it would be the subject of late-night jokes for the rest of her life.
Biden, on the other hand, seems to skate along making gaffe after gaffe without anyone other than us nasty right-wing bloggers seeming to care. There is no aftermath for him to deal with because most of the press simply ignore his gaffes.
Therefore, another part of the reason for the disparity of treatment is that Joe Biden is a liberal and Dan Quayle and Sarah Palin are conservatives. The media and comics are overwhelmingly liberal and use their platforms to push their cause, and this means highlighting gaffes by people they don't like and ignoring those of people they do like.
So in the end, I conclude that there are three reasons for the disparity in treatment. Not in order of importance, they are: Image and how you present yourself, how you handle the aftermath, and media bias.
Monday Evening Update
No sooner do I write the above post than Senator Biden proves the case. Via ABC News (H/T NRO)
"Mark my words," the Democratic vice presidential nominee said at a Seattle fundraiser Sunday, "it will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don't remember anything else I said. Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."
Wait a second. I thought that with the ascendancy of The One the rest of the world would all like us again? Isn't that why we are supposed to elect him?
But now "the world" will test Obama with an "international crisis, a generated crisis"? Why would they generate a crisis, if he's the one we've all been waiting for?
But wait, it gets better. Biden continues:
"I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate," Biden said, including the Middle East and Russia as possibilities, "and he's gonna need help. And the kind of help he's gonna need is, he's gonna need you - not financially to help him - we're gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it's not gonna be apparent initially, it's not gonna be apparent that we're right."
What in the world does that "not gonna be apparent initially...that we're right" bit mean? That he's going to screw it up initially?
Don't leave me yet, there's more:
"Gird your loins," Biden told the crowd. "We're gonna win with your help, God willing, we're gonna win, but this is not gonna be an easy ride."
Do what?
The garrulous Biden...
or rather, "The blithering idiot"
...said that he's "forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know, so I'm not being falsely humble with you."
Oh yes that was certainly humble of you.
"I think I can be value added, but this guy(Obama) has it. This guy has it. But he's gonna need your help. Because I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us.""
Or maybe he'll be down in the polls because people will come to their senses and realize that he has no idea how to handle international crises, and that his blithering idiot of a vice president is of no help whatsoever.
Posted by Tom at October 19, 2008 8:45 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/1215
Comments
"So why is it that Joe Biden does not suffer the same fate as Dan Quayle? "
For the same reason that the man who replaced Congressman Mark Foley after he resigned in shame for sending some lewd emails to pages wasn't kicked out of congress for having multiple mistresses and using hush money to keep at least one of them quiet.
If you have an R after your name you are held to a higher standard than those who have a D after theirs.
Posted by: Mike's America
at October 19, 2008 10:45 PM
"We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us."
Goodness, could he be speaking of a draft? What else could come down the pike if someone in the international community tried to test us? With a draft, the generals would have the boots they keep saying they need, and they would be told to get the job done once and for all. How long can we keep redeploying the same people? When are we going to have peace and be rid of the barbarians unless we do an all-out effort?
I am just supposing. My uncles and cousins were drafted in WWII and for Vietnam. That is why I can't understand that if we are involved in a conflict with those that would endanger our security, why is there no draft as before?
I thought that my husband had been drafted for Korea, but he says there was no draft then, he and his friends volunteered on their own for the Marines, right after high school when the Korean War was still on. He said that conflict was called a "policing action" and that our military (the Army and Navy) is still there as a deterrant (?).
I heard Obama say, "We are going to ask you to serve your country", meaning that the handouts (college or military pensions, etc.) people expect from him would come at a price of community service for two years or enlistment in the military?
I wonder.
Emilie
Port Orchard, WA
Posted by: Emilie at October 23, 2008 7:36 PM
Hi Emile
I can't imagine that anyone would institute a draft. The opposition from all sides would be fierce, but the left would especially go bonkers.
Obama, however has outlined a plan for creating some sort of "civilian national security force":
Obama had first outlined many of the proposals he talked about Wednesday during appearances in Iowa last December."We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," he said Wednesday. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."
While his plan is for "national service", methinks it'll be abused and twised so that the volunteers end up pushing the liberal agenda.
His delightful wife, Michelle, goes even farther in what she wants:
"Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone. . . . Barack Obama will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual — uninvolved, uninformed."
This is precisely why I'm working as hard as I can to elect John McCain and Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at October 23, 2008 10:00 PM



