« Lila Rose Takes On Planned Parenthood of Tennessee | Main | Afghanistan Insurgent Attacks Compared to Iraq »

April 30, 2009

Reckless Endangerment By ABC News

Via the Mark Levin Show, I hear that three ABC reporters, Brian Ross, Matthew Cole, and Joseph have published a piece called "The CIA's $1,000 a Day Specialists on Waterboarding, Interrogations The New Focus on Two Retired Military Psychologists Called the 'Architects' of the CIA's Techniques"

As with Levin, I will not link to the piece. If you like you can google for it yourself. Suffice it to say that it is a hit piece. They not only publish the names of the retired military psychologists but their photos as well.

The words of Mark Steyn come to mind:

"Well, I think when we listen to terrorists talking about the new caliphate, and there are a bunch of guys sitting in the cave, we think they're nuts. When a guy is sitting in the cave listening to Bill Keller explain proudly why he betrayed America's national security interests, that guy in the cave would rightly conclude that we're the ones that are nuts. And it's hard to disagree with him."

Replace Bill Keller with the guys from ABC and Steyn has it exactly right.

The left has never understood the truism of what George Orwell meant when he said that:

"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm. "

What we have is more reckless endangerment of honest Americans who struggled with how to exact information from some of the world's most dangerous terrorists and gave their best assessment of how to do it. Now every nutjob jihadist will be gunning for them, not to mention the American left who will no doubt seek to make their lives miserable, if they haven't already.

Michael Goldfarb at The Weekly Standard has the scoop on one of the ABC reporters, Matthew Cole, as well as some other on-target comments:

ABC runs a report showing the names and faces of two CIA contractors who may have had a role in the waterboarding of KSM and Abu Zubaydah. The network apparently outsourced this report to a freelancer named Matthew Cole, whose record in Nexis includes just three bylines -- two stories for Salon (one of which about "how Bush administration aid to Pakistan helps fund insurgents who kill U.S. troops"), and one for the San Jose Mercury News just two days after 9/11 reporting "anxiety about a backlash" among Muslims, who assure the reporter that the attack "has nothing to do with Islam."

In other words, Cole is a left-wing partisan with questionable reporting chops. This is obvious from the quality of the story tonight. Cole repeats the now throughly debunked claim that Zubaydah and KSM were waterboarded 83 and 183 times respectively. He posts video of the two refusing to answer questions in what is staged as a faux perp walk with no discernible news value other than to portray them as criminals. And, most amazingly, Cole indicts the two men for not having any experience prior to their work for the CIA -- as though being "previously involved in the U.S. military program to train pilots how to survive behind enemy lines and resist brutal tactics" isn't relevant.

ABC's conduct here, exposing two men who will now become obvious targets for terrorists and left-wing extremists, is deplorable. Will the Obama administration investigate who leaked their identities? Or is it now open-season on Americans who were only doing what their government asked of them in order to protect their country from attack?

It is open season, Michael, and it's only going to get worse. Obama has opened a Pandora's box that he'll find difficult if not impossible to close. He and his fellow liberals are recklessly endangering our national security. By doing so, he is sowing the seeds of his own destruction. America finally woke up to Jimmy Carter, and we'll do the same with Obama and his ilk.

Posted by Tom at April 30, 2009 9:00 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/1340

Comments

From the ABC report:

But it turns out neither Mitchell nor Jessen had any experience in conducting actual interrogations before the CIA hired them.

"They went to two individuals who had no interrogation experience," said Col. Kleinman. "They are not interrogators."

Seem an important piece of information to know that such a task was given to people with no experience. I would call that negligence. If you call the reporter biased with questionable reporting chops, then how do you qualify these two being in charge of such an operation without any experience?

It scares me that after spending so much time in training our force to meet our defense needs, we rely on outside contractors to get the job done. That includes contractors who provide showers that electrocute our soldiers, provide food and water that make our soldiers sick, provide interrogators with no experience, and many other mistakes of negligence that harm our forces.

I could agree that this is information that would normally be kept quiet, but since the operation had such a negative effect on the United States reputation around the World, and was such a failure, then the questions are legitimate.

As I have said before, President Obama is not happy about all of this getting investigated. And again in his press conference last night he called it a mistake, not a crime.

And who promised to prosecute whoever leaked Ms. Williams identity and not only never did, but chose to try to defame the character of both her and her husband (an Ambassador) as their course to deal with the matter.

"The LEFT has never understood the truism of what George Orwell meant when he said that:"

Who was in charge (President) when we took on the dangers of WW I, WW II, or the Korean war? Wilson, FDR, Truman - a pack of conservatives?

Americans see now with the passing of time and the facts coming out, the clear negative results of the Bush - conservative decisions while in power.

Obama has only been there for 3 months, By a definitive majority vote of the American people. Something Bush could not claim.

The American people have made mistakes before in their choice of leaders, but give Americans the right to see their decision through its natural course.

At the end of the Obama Presidency, as with Bush, the truth will come out and the facts will declare whether his choices were mistakes, or not.

Posted by: Time at April 30, 2009 11:07 PM

The Orwell quote is a good one. But there's an deliberate tension in it.

It partly means, "we like to pretend these rough men don't exist, but they do - and we ignore their existence at our peril."

Orwell would not have approved of an argument that these rough men be exempt from the rule of law, that the exact roughness of what they do be necessarily shrouded in mystery - even to those they're meant to be protecting. He would have wanted the rough men to be accountable.

Posted by: Mylne Karimov at May 1, 2009 8:13 AM

"And, most amazingly, Cole indicts the two men for not having any experience prior to their work for the CIA -- as though being "previously involved in the U.S. military program to train pilots how to survive behind enemy lines and resist brutal tactics" isn't relevant."

Hey Tom, are you too stupid to read???

Posted by: Pam at May 1, 2009 10:35 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)