« Good News About the Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program | Main | The Definitive Column on the Liberal/Media Reaction to the Rep Gabrielle Giffords Shooting »
January 15, 2011
The Chinese "Stealth" Fighter is Not Really a Fighter After All
A few days ago I wrote a post about the new Chinese J-20, in which I expressed concern that this thing appeared out of nowhere and caught us totally by surprise. SecDef Gates has confirmed that he didn't know about it.
But what's interesting is that it apparently isn't a fighter at all; it's a medium-range attack bomber, sort of an updated version of our F-111 Aardvark. The F-111 entered service in 1967,and was used a few times in Vietnam. We used it to attack Libya in 1986, and it saw extensive service in the 1991 Gulf War. It was retired by the USAF in 1996, it's place being taken by the F-15E Strike Eagle. The Australians used it, but retired their last models last year.

Here, again, are the photos of the Chinese J-20 that are making the rounds:

Go to my Jan 8 post for details.
The Real Mission of the J-20
From Air Power Australia (h/t TWS):
The emergence of China's new J-XX [J-20] stealth fighter will have a profound strategic impact, for both the United States and its numerous Pacific Rim allies. There can be no doubt that it is proof positive of the absolute and complete failure of the current OSD driven plan for recapitalisation of the United States tactical fighter fleet, and the fleets of its allies. Like the Russian T-50 PAK-FA, the J-XX [J-20] is a "game changer" in the sense that the large scale deployment of operational production examples of these aircraft invalidates all of the key assumptions central to United States and allied air power and force structure planning and development, since the early 1990si.In terms of gross sizing the [J-20] most closely resembles the smaller configurations proposed for the "theatre bomber" [version of the F-22 Raptor], which was to be a dedicated bomber and [surveillance] airframe, intended to supercruise to targets at combat radii in excess of 1,000 nautical miles, a niche occupied by the...F/FB-111 family of aircraft during the Cold War. Claims that the Chengdu design is a "Sino-F-22A" make little sense, if the latter were true the aircraft would be considerably smaller....
In technological strategy terms the combination of stealth and [sustained supersonic flight, known as] supercruise yields high lethality and survivability, supercruise yields high per-sortie productivity, and the sizing and thus combat radius of the airframe provide a basic design with the flexibility to be used effectively across the spectrum of roles covered by the Cold War design F/FB-111 and proposed FB-22 families of aircraft.
Thomas Donnelly of the TNS article linked to above explains further:
To translate from geek-speak: The new Chinese plane is a revival of an idea championed by former Air Force Secretary James Roche to build an enlarged version of the F-22 to fulfill the medium-range bomber role of the old F-111. It can go a long way, carry a lot of ordnance, and penetrate modern air defense networks. The F-22B project was scrapped in the Bush years and, of course, the Obama administration in 2009 chose to end F-22 production altogether, but it seems the Chinese thought it was a good idea.Such a capability would add an important new arrow to the People's Liberation Army's quiver, allowing it not only to reach farther - possibly as far as Guam, where immense investments in new facilities (for submarines, B-2 bombers and a supply hub) are being made - but to sustain a punishing air campaign of the "shock and awe" variety. We should expect the Chinese to build a large fleet of these planes, more than the 187 Raptors of the U.S. Air Force. The J-20 will complement but ultimately prove far more decisive than the large fleet of cruise and ballistic missiles that the PLA has been building for more than a decade.
The big brains in the Pentagon have been arguing that the Chinese military buildup is designed to "deny access" to current U.S. forces in the Western Pacific, but the J-20 seems to be more of an instrument of traditional power projection. In other words, the PLA not only wants to kick us out but to move into the resulting security vacuum.
Last November I wrote a post about how our bases in the western Pacific were vulnerable to attack by conventionally-armed Chinese ballistic missiles. Now it looks like the threat will get even worse.
Posted by Tom at January 15, 2011 9:30 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.theredhunter.com/mt/refer.cgi/1692
Comments
I flew the F-111A, D and F strike fighter in the 80s. Despite the best efforts of OSD in the 60s, it was never the multi-role fighter that Secretary McNamara intended it to be. But it became a very capable precision air-to-ground weapons delivery platform (much to the chagrin of the Libyans and the Iraqis). In the 60s, phased array multitrole radars did not exist, and neither did computer-aided flight controls -- so airplanes designed for ground attack did ground attack -- and airplanes designed for air superiority were not very capable bombing platforms. So I would be very careful of underestimating the J-20's capabilities as a fighter.that analogy when assessing the capabilities of modern fighters. With the right avionics, enough signal and data processing power and the right armaments, the J-20 could be an advanced F-15E equivalent, or a long-range, low-observable "Super Strike Eagle" -- performing what we used to call "self-escort" -- getting close enough to AWACS/Hawkeye to take them out with long-range air-to-air missiles and then penetrating what is left of our air defenses to carry out their strike missions against Taiwan, the fleet, or Guam. Once their bombs were gone, they would swing back to air-to-air and fight their way back out.
Posted by: Bill at January 16, 2011 9:20 PM
Bill, thanks so much for stopping by. Thank you also for your service to our country.
I think now that you're right about the J-20; it might not be a dogfighter, or meant primarily for air superiority, but that doesn't mean it has no air-to-air role at all. The F-18 Super Hornet comes to mind. I hadn't thought of the threat to our AWACS and Hawkeye planes, but that is very worrisome.
Posted by: Tom the Redhunter at January 19, 2011 6:08 PM



